So even if it takes 20 % of performance we still should be able to get to solid 60 FPS with high end rigs.ĭenuvo is not to blame here as it is not causing FPS drops people are dealing with.Īlso it secures revenue so what is even to discuss here. Well as others said.WH2 also had denuvo and nobody ever complained.
And only if it worked - which it doesn't since the piracy rates for the game are insane. And their opinion just as that of many others is that it is a piece of **** which takes away even 20% or more of your hardware's performance. I think they have more knowledge than you - or I - ever will. All they do all day long is test pc hardware performance. Zero knowledge? Try asking Gamers Nexus or Linus about Denuvo and their opinion on it. They are looking into it and probably will fix it. They have to fix performance mainly with particle effects. Why would they? Because some people pointed finger at denuvo with exactly zero knowledge? So IF CA cares about players and performance issue, they should remove it from the game.ĭenuvo is just an anti consumer software that punish people who buy the game. We have numerus exemple of cracked version of denuvo game that run better than the DRM version : We had Amplitude with humankind who removed before launch because of performance isssue (and they are also part of SEGA) : Whatever it's true or false, Denuvo is known to impact performance on game Every single hardware reviewer out there said so for a long time and they can't all be idiots.Ĭa is known to make some lies when they are in that kind of position. That said Denuvo has serious serious performance impact issues. I actually had the exact same thoughts as you did on point 2. That's an API/driver/engine issue related to that family of visual effects, how CA managed to break it (especially between pre-release and release) I have no clue, but fixing that should make things a lot better across the board for a lot of people.Ģ) Whatever CA did with their patch that broke the optimisation it's probably not related to Denuvo since it was already there before that patch will flat out halve everybody's frame rate whenever they are on screen, regardless of hardware. during the Khorne battle in the prologue campaign), steam clouds coming out of big waterfalls etc.
It is "just" a select number of alpha (and possibly decal) effects that are completely broken and for some reason tank performance whenever they are on screen.Ĭampaign map fog (which luckily can be toned down a lot via options), some flame and/or smoke alpha layers (e.g. To be fair, the optimization for WH3 is not terrible either, the game by and large performs basically identical to WH2 while looking the same if not a bit better. I don't remember particular optimization complaints when WH2 released, certainly not compared to how WH1 looked and ran, apart from some very specific errors for a handful of hardware configurations. They made optimization better over the years, but it was definitely more optimized than this even at launch.
I've played Valkyria Chronicles 4 offline. I play both Warhammer II and Three Kingdoms offline. This is a weird-ass thread to decide to necro.Ģ. +1 will never support those games nor trust the companies behind themġ. Originally posted by Future-Proof:You forgot about the list of games that are rentals tied to servers that force you to ask permission every time you want to play them: But if you're on the fence and this Denuvo thing has got you spooked? I wouldn't worry. If you care more about the cause than enjoying the game, more power to you, I don't mind the fight to remove potentially seedy software from our games. Here's a completely coincidental list of games that haven't lead to any significant breaches of privacy, SSD destruction, or other major scandals for their users:ĭenuvo Anti-Tamper is in a lot of things. Here's a list of just some of the games that use Denuvo Anti-Tamper:
0 kommentar(er)
